Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc spent two intense days in monitor testing at Sakhir, Bahrain. Quite a lot of scheduled work was efficiently accomplished in all features, so far as we all know. Other than the rain, which was a little bit of a nuisance for each drivers, the exams offered the group with a wealth of vital info. A considerable amount of knowledge to course of, extraordinarily helpful for assessing the assorted traits of the Ferrari and defining the distinctive traits of the automotive. This was the plan, to stipulate the aerodynamic map and set up the boundaries of the setup.
Inside this aggressive situation, we will conduct a primary evaluation concerning driving types and different attention-grabbing parameters, serving to us higher perceive the preferences of the 2 drivers on the wheel of the Ferrari SF-25. All of that is made potential because of the invaluable help of telemetry. This can be a really efficient device that, when used to perfection, permits us on this particular case to look at the conduct and method of Ferrari’s two drivers. Let’s due to this fact start with a direct comparability between Lewis and Charles, analyzing their quickest laps within the Italian automotive.
Initially, there’s a “suspicion” concerning the setup, as it seems that Charles Leclerc had a extra aerodynamically loaded configuration. We will infer this from the highest speeds and in addition from how he navigates the “snake” in Sector 1: the Monegasque driver tackles this part extra easily, even going flat out in corners 6 and seven, highlighting each the SF-25’s effectiveness in path modifications and the boldness he had in finishing this sequence. Within the first three corners, nevertheless, the Englishman’s conduct is decisively higher: from his use of the pedals, we discover that he’s barely extra aggressive than Charles Leclerc, getting on the throttle earlier.
On this part alone, he positive aspects 0.072 seconds. The remaining benefit constructed by the Briton within the first sector comes from flip 4, which typically induces oversteer on exit: right here, Charles Leclerc struggled greater than Lewis Hamilton all through the session, together with on his quickest lap. Regardless of having the ability to carry extra minimal pace by means of the middle of the nook, the previous Alfa Romeo driver has to delay full throttle till his wheels are utterly straight. Over the course of the lap, we observe that the Monegasque was virtually at all times quicker in minimal cornering speeds.
One of many causes is easy: he makes use of the brake pedal much less to decelerate, relying extra on engine braking. He does this whereas nonetheless managing to offer the automotive the suitable rotation. Quite the opposite, basically, Lewis Hamilton tends to hold extra pace on the finish of the straights, making an attempt to brake as late as potential. This method typically forces him to make use of the left pedal greater than essential to keep away from understeer.
Because the lap continues, each Ferrari drivers had been flawless in flip 13, the place the SF-25 struggled on Wednesday, primarily attributable to excessive setups. Lewis Hamilton himself confirmed this, because the engineers wanted to know the automotive’s limits to outline the aerodynamic map. On the second day of testing, the entrance of the Ferrari was very sharp, permitting it to hit the apex exactly, with the rear following easily with none indicators of instability.
Moreover, as soon as once more, we will recognize Charles Leclerc’s most popular approach: trailing-throttle. From what we’ve seen, he’s the one driver on the whole grid who makes use of it, as it is extremely tough to execute successfully.
Within the analyzed lap, Charles Leclerc retains a slight quantity of throttle open even whereas cornering. The explanation stays the identical: balancing the automotive’s weight, shifting it from the entrance to the rear, and consequently placing down all the ability from the 066/15 energy unit sooner. The truth that the Monegasque driver makes use of this method is a constructive signal, because it proves that the SF-25’s entrance finish holds up effectively regardless of the burden switch towards the rear axle.
— see video above —