Max Verstappen in opposition to Oscar Piastri, the duel in Jeddah underneath the magnifying glass: for Carlo Vanzini, the “VAR” is damaging duels in F1. The Saudi Arabian Grand Prix is determined on the first nook: the McLaren driver will get a greater begin, pulls alongside his rival and pushes him to the skin. The Dutchman then decides to chop the chicane with out giving again the place: for the stewards, it’s a penalty.
The post-race in Jeddah was among the many least vigorous of the season. The highest three, exhausted from one of many hardest races on the calendar, struggled to smile. Oscar Piastri, who typically remembers the coldness of Kimi Raikkonen, makes a small gesture of pleasure. Max Verstappen, upset by the penalty he acquired, instantly goes to talk with Mohammed Ben Sulayem. Charles Leclerc maybe resigns himself to a barely passable consequence.
The Dutchman, particularly, was in no way pleased with the stewards’ resolution. A number of hours later, Christian Horner is able to display, with images and screenshots, the innocence of his driver. Another person even argues that “5 seconds are too few.” Nevertheless, the actual level might be one other: may such a strict regulation, utilized like VAR in fashionable soccer, injury the great thing about racing?
The “VAR” of F1: Carlo Vanzini and the issue with duels
Carlo Vanzini additionally analyzes the Verstappen-Piastri case in a video shared on his YouTube channel. The Italian voice of F1 compares the stewards’ resolution to VAR in soccer: “As soon as, episodes like this or like Abu Dhabi 2024 would have been thought-about shared blame. What saddened me is that now, you possibly can hardly race anymore.”
“Now every little thing have to be determined, verified and checked, a bit like since VAR got here into soccer. It’s important to analyze the pure velocity, for the time being… This resolution disenchanted me, however not for Max, Oscar or anybody particularly.”
“I reviewed the information body by body: Oscar Piastri will get a greater begin, there isn’t any doubt. Can or not it’s thought-about that he didn’t full the overtake on Verstappen? That is the analysis made by the Federation, regardless that Piastri assaults the nook. Since he didn’t full the overtake, he’s nonetheless thought-about to be attacking and, on the apex of the nook, the place of the entrance axle in comparison with the automobile on the skin isn’t taken into consideration.”
“The rule thought-about is that, whoever is on the within, if their entrance axle is at the very least on the top of the mirrors of the defending automobile, can take no matter line they need. That is why Verstappen acquired a penalty, as a result of he was defending from Oscar Piastri. To me, logically, it appeared the other: that Oscar Piastri was defending from a counterattack by Verstappen.”
“As soon as, drivers sorted it out on observe amongst themselves. We don’t need the Wild West, however we’ve gone too far, a bit like VAR that punishes even the slightest touches. This isn’t my factor, regardless that I’m all the time loopy about Method 1. It’s a pity as a result of a precedent is about, and nobody will attempt to overtake on the skin like that anymore.”
Purchase official Ferrari F1 merchandise!
Let different Scuderia Followers learn about us
